Microsoft Claims they own Linux

Since it's inception in 1991, Linux, an open source operating system, has been worked on by thousands of developers. It was seen by many to be a viable alternative to Microsoft's (proprietary, expensive, unstable and security deficient) Windows operating system.

The idea behind Linux and the software that goes with it, like other open source projects, was that it was free, anyone could work on it and modify it to their own needs but they had to publish their changes so that others could do the same. More of a community than a product, Linux has become a favourite of developers who work together (albeit somewhat competitively) to build a better mousetrap.

Now, after 16 years, Microsoft has decided that Linux violates 235 of it's patents and would like both distributors and end users to start paying them royalties.

My hunch is that Vista, which by most accounts is not nearly worth the trouble, is not taking off as well as they had hoped and they would like to (following the model laid down by some large music and media companies) add some extra revenue by suing people.

There was a time when the way to have a successful and profitable company was by making a good, reliable product, selling that product and treating your customers well. Those days appear to be gone and Microsoft never bought into that philosophy in the first place.